Act I, Scene I: The newsroom of a major metropolitan daily
Reporter: Hey, boss! We’ve got a story here. Says the Pope might have allowed a priest who was accused of abuse to work in a parish while he was Archbishop of Munich. What should we do with it?
Editor: Did the Pope personally assign the priest to parish work?
Reporter: No; his vicar general did.
Editor: Did the Pope know about it?
Reporter: No evidence of that.
Editor: Did the Pope know this priest at all?
Reporter: No evidence.
Editor: Did this priest abuse other kids while the Pope was there?
Reporter: No evidence of that either.
Editor: What the heck. So we don't have all the details. Still, if the Pope was soft on abuse, that's news. Let’s splash it across the front page anyway.
Act I, Scene II: The same newsroom
Reporter: Hey, boss! Another story about the Pope. Seems that he didn’t laicize a priest from Milwaukee who was accused of abuse.
Editor: Was the Pope responsible for laicizing this priest?
Reporter: No; the local archbishop had the authority to do it.
Editor: Did the Pope stall the disciplinary process?
Reporter: No; the local archdiocese waited 40 years to do anything about it.
Editor: Did this priest abuse other kids after the Pope decided against laicization?
Reporter: No, he was old and sick by then. He died a few months later.
Editor: What the heck. So we don't have all the details. Still, if the Pope was soft on abuse, that's news. Let’s splash it across the front page anyway.
Act I, Scene III: The same newsroom
Reporter: Hey, boss! Here’s a different story on the Pope. Says that he was pushing for tougher disciplinary action against abusive priests.
Editor: Was this recently?
Reporter: No; way back in 1988.
Editor: You mean back when all the other bishops were hiding these abusers, he was trying to get rid of them?
Reporter: That’s what the documents say.
Editor: So he was really leading the charge against abuse all along?
Reporter: Looks that way.
Editor: OK. No big deal. So the Pope wasn't soft on abuse? Who ever said he was? Put it on page 17.
Saturday, December 04, 2010
When News Isn't News
Diogenes brought a little smile to my face with this: I suspect he had the New York Times in mind but it could apply to the Times, Guardian, Independant or the BBC.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Lord’s descent into the underworld
At Matins/the Office of Readings on Holy Saturday the Church gives us this 'ancient homily', I find it incredibly moving, it is abou...
-
A French newspaper has reported Pope Francis, once Benedict dies, will abrogate Summorum Pontificum and handover Old Rite's celebrat...
-
I was at the Verona Opera Festival when Summorum Pontificum was published but it wasn't until All Souls Day that I first attempted to s...
-
In a conversation with our bishop recently, I thought he said that some parishes in the diocese were already using the new ICEL translations...
3 comments:
Good news ain't news, eh?
Priceless!. But sadly all too true
Well chosen picture, Father. Roll out the barrel.
Post a Comment